Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

Sure thing Joe. ‘Tis done.

Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

This has been added now as a light user and anonymous user option in 2.1. Admins, can we change this to implemented?

Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

I’d also apreciate this feature, seeing it as a way to provide a user for the api while reading data.
Also, would this user/role be paid as a normal user? Having to buy a license for an observer or a “machine” seems like a tough case to sell. In my case it would tilt the user count from free to paying, since the team is already 5 persons.

Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

Joe – This didn’t make the 2.0 release but it is in the ‘candidate’ pot for selection for our next release. We will keep you posted.

Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

Did this make it in to the 2.0 release?

Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

Hi Johnny,

We have plans to make Read Only and Anonymous users available in upcoming releases. Stay tuned.

Thanks,
Adam

Topic: [implemented-2.1] New "observer" role

Some orgs want to let users external to a project to have non-intrusive visibility into it.

It would be good to have a role with rights in between the non-project-member Mingle user, and the project-member Mingle user – say an “observer” role.

An observer would have read-only access to Mingle. You could also further limit content they have access to, e.g., not able to see permissions of other project team members.