Support for MSBuild and Sourcegear Vault#723

Subscribe to Support for MSBuild and Sourcegear Vault 10 post(s), 9 voice(s)

 
Avatar paulvanbrenk 1 post #1903

Is support for msbuild and Sourcegear Vault planned?

 
Avatar Jez Humble Administrator 108 post(s) #1905

Hey Paul

Ultimately we plan to support everything—it’s just a matter of time. However we don’t expect SourceGear Vault in the very near future (read next few months). TFS and Perforce are higher up our list at the moment.

MSBuild we do plan extended support for very soon (next few months). However you can actually use it right now though—just use the “exec” builder to run it as if you were typing it in from the command line.

 
Avatar Ben Richardson 1 post #1911

Another vote for msbuild and Sourcegear Vault.

 
Avatar Jez Humble Administrator 108 post(s) #1944

Thanks Ben. Like I say—you can already do msbuild via the “exec” builder.

Sourcegear Vault is rapidly moving up my priority list as I get inundated with requests for it.

 
Avatar rgb 1 post #1955

The combination of CruiseControl.NET, Vault, and FogBugz appear to be very widespread. So another vote for Sourcegear Vault (see [Case #09297-AB0F] Support for SourceGear Vault).

 
Avatar michael.aird 1 post #1972

+1 vote for MSBuild. i know you can call it from “exec” but even CruiseControl.net has pseudo support for MSBuild built in.

Also, it would be nice to see full-blown support for an MSTest test runner.

 
Avatar Anthony Abate 15 post(s) #1993

Another vote for MS Build

 
Avatar Pete Mounce 47 post(s) #2154

+1 for MSBuild in spite of exec support.

 
Avatar James O'Sull... 6 post(s) #2420

+1 vote for Sourcegear Vault/Fortress support.

 
Avatar Michael Pala... 1 post #2496

+1 for Vault.