Does Mingle scale well?#631
|
|
My team uses Mingle since October last year and currently we have 1016 cards in our project. Since a few weeks, in which we created many cards, we have seen more and more scaling issues. I will bring examples to the Mingle user meeting next week, but I like to use this forum to investigate whether other teams suffer from the same performance problems that we see. We have the feeling that the more cards we add, the slower Mingle becomes. There is already a discussion in http://studios.thoughtworks.com/discussion/forums/7/topics/595 about the unresponsive script, and I just posted a performance problem with the hierarchy view (in the bug forum). My concern is that Mingle may not scale well. If it does not, it will become a serious risk for my team’s project. So I like to start a discussion and collect feedback that TW can use to improve any scaling issues we experience. So:
Thanks for any feedback. |
|
|
Koen – thank you for bringing your problems to our notice. The number of cards on your project does not impact Mingle’s ability to scale. No particular project or its data should impact how Mingle scales. Performance of Mingle, on the other hand, is dependent on many factors, including project structure (tree configurations, property count, etc.) and, unfortunately, we cannot help you without knowing specifics of your project. I would suggest that you log an issue with the mingle support team; along with specifics about your project. A project export/db export, with sanitized data, would be most appreciated. To give you some details of configurations that do not cause a problem, the mingle instance we use to run the mingle project contains more than 3700 cards & 4 trees, The instance runs on a Windows VM with 2GB RAM; MySQL db. |
|
|
Additionally, you should see some improvement in the performance of the hierarchy view with the 2.0.1 release that will be available tomorrow. |
|
|
Has anyone load tested mingle? I’m curious how it would scale at 10000, 20000, 500000+ cards. |
