<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>studios.thoughtworks.com - The state of the art of Functional Testing Comments</title>
  <id>tag:studios.thoughtworks.com,2008:/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing/comments</id>
  <generator version="0.8.0" uri="http://mephistoblog.com">Mephisto Drax</generator>
  <link href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing/comments.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml"/>
  <link href="/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
  <updated>2008-04-09T08:59:56Z</updated>
  <entry xml:base="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/">
    <author>
      <name>Michel Sabourin</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:studios.thoughtworks.com,2007-11-28:996:1000</id>
    <published>2008-03-28T22:56:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-28T22:56:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Blog"/>
    <link href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'The state of the art of Functional Testing' by Michel Sabourin</title>
<content type="html">Hi Vivek, Any update on this most promising project? Thanks.</content>  </entry>
  <entry xml:base="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/">
    <author>
      <name>Derek W.</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:studios.thoughtworks.com,2007-11-28:996:999</id>
    <published>2007-12-29T01:35:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-29T01:35:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Blog"/>
    <link href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'The state of the art of Functional Testing' by Derek W.</title>
<content type="html">I have to agree with Tim; what a tease. I'm all tingling inside wondering what sweet new testing tool your going to release. Can we at least get some quick snippets of general specs, screenshots... All I have to say about features is that it better play well with Mingle...</content>  </entry>
  <entry xml:base="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/">
    <author>
      <name>Tim Alexander</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:studios.thoughtworks.com,2007-11-28:996:998</id>
    <published>2007-12-15T11:10:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-15T11:10:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Blog"/>
    <link href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'The state of the art of Functional Testing' by Tim Alexander</title>
<content type="html">WHAT?????? You build me up, and then leave me hanging like that? That's horrible! I might not even like using the tool once it comes out because of this. Of course, I'll use it. Just like I use Sahi, Selenium, and I'm starting to use Frankenstien. But I won't like it. (OK, maybe I will. I always do) ^_^ So.... Any tidbits on what this might be aimed at?</content>  </entry>
  <entry xml:base="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/">
    <author>
      <name>Sriram Narayanan</name>
    </author>
    <id>tag:studios.thoughtworks.com,2007-11-28:996:997</id>
    <published>2007-12-08T01:47:00Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-08T01:47:00Z</updated>
    <category term="Blog"/>
    <link href="http://studios.thoughtworks.com/2007/11/28/the-state-of-the-art-of-functional-testing" rel="alternate" type="text/html"/>
    <title>Comment on 'The state of the art of Functional Testing' by Sriram Narayanan</title>
<content type="html">I'm about to evaluate the internal release :)</content>  </entry>
</feed>
